FELICITIES - significado y definición. Qué es FELICITIES
Diclib.com
Diccionario ChatGPT
Ingrese una palabra o frase en cualquier idioma 👆
Idioma:

Traducción y análisis de palabras por inteligencia artificial ChatGPT

En esta página puede obtener un análisis detallado de una palabra o frase, producido utilizando la mejor tecnología de inteligencia artificial hasta la fecha:

  • cómo se usa la palabra
  • frecuencia de uso
  • se utiliza con más frecuencia en el habla oral o escrita
  • opciones de traducción
  • ejemplos de uso (varias frases con traducción)
  • etimología

Qué (quién) es FELICITIES - definición


Felicities      
·pl of Felicity.
Infelicity         
WIKTIONARY REDIRECT
·noun That (as an act, word, expression, ·etc.) which is infelicitous; as, infelicities of speech.
II. Infelicity ·noun The state or quality of being infelicitous; unhappiness; misery; wretchedness; misfortune; want of suitableness or appropriateness.
felicity         
WIKIMEDIA DISAMBIGUATION PAGE
Felicitas (saint); Felicity (disambiguation)
1.
Felicity is great happiness and pleasure. (LITERARY)
...joy and felicity.
N-UNCOUNT
2.
Felicity is the quality of being good, pleasant, or desirable. (LITERARY)
...his conversational manner and easy verbal felicity.
N-UNCOUNT
Ejemplos de uso de FELICITIES
1. Those events give you frictive power.‘ In any case, he says: ‘Frank Bascombe is not there to be approved of, or to be found always consistent – since none of us is – but to be provocative or persuasive, to please you with his felicities and inquiring mind.
2. It seems hard to believe that it was the Blair ghostwriter who, concluded the same piece with the challenge: "If there‘s a better idea, let‘s hear it." Nor, for that matter, does it seem likely that the Dickens fan would have contributed felicities such as, "they didn‘t want less contestability", or "the creativity of the frontline". Aside from its absolute determination not to discuss, mention, or even accept by implication the existence of war in Iraq, the most striking thing about Blair‘s article was surely its lurching unevenness of tone.